Letter to the Editor of the Croydon Guardian on Monday 5th August, 2013:
If New Addington Library is unfit for use, why is it good enough for Salvation Army?
The writer, a Forestdale resident, makes the case that the statements made by key Conservative councillors lead the community to believe that the old New Addington building is no longer fit for habitation.
He quotes local Councillor, Tony Pearson, who stated that,
"The current library building is old and not really fit for purpose",Cllr Sara Bashford stated,
"We will be moving the library into the Calat, that is the plan at the moment. To shut the current building which is quite old and getting to the end of its useful life".
"The library is currently in a quite old, crumbling building".
And this argument was reinforced by Councillor Tim Pollard, stating,
"We are going to relocate the library for two reasons. One is the existing building is no longer fit for purpose – it is falling to bits. It was built back at a time when building standards weren't great".
Taking all of the above into account, the writer makes the reasonable assumption that that the old New Addington building is in a virtual state of collapse.
So the resident poses a very reasonable question, as follows:
My question is why, if the old library building, which was "not fit for purpose" in 2011 and "getting to the end of it's useful life", "quite old and crumbling" and "falling to bits" in 2012, is it now, and for the next 18 to 24 months, being leased to The Salvation Army, who are using it as a play centre for the children of New Addington?
Are Croydon Council callously putting money ahead of the safety of the residents of New Addington, or were Councillors Pearson, Bashford and Pollard deliberately lying, so as to smooth the way for Croydon Council to get the green light, as they have done this week, to sell the land to a major supermarket?
And finally, will Croydon Council assume liability if the building does "crumble" or "fall to pieces" and people are injured or possibly killed, or more to the point, will Councillors Pearson, Bashford and Pollard be reprimanded, dismissed, or even prosecuted, if the building is found to be perfectly safe, and they are found to have been lying, scaremongering and abusing their power when placed into a position of trust?Thanks to Gary James McIver for exposing this. Please get in touch if you know more. Can this really be true?
Email us at firstname.lastname@example.org or add a comment below.
You can read the full text of the letter here.