An extraordinary meeting has been called for Monday 18th March at 6.30pm. The first any resident knew of this was when the details were circulated via facebook and email, late on Thursday.
To save you trying to find the papers buried on the council website the link is:
https://secure.croydon.gov.uk/akscroydon/users/public/admin/kab14.pl?operation=SUBMIT&meet=3&cmte=EMC&grpid=public&arc=1&utm_source=Library+Main&utm_campaign=3fbede5031-Emergency_Meeting3_16_2013&utm_medium=email
The only items for consideration are:
MATTER FOR CONSIDERATION BY THE COUNCILFollowing the receipt of a requisition signed by 13 Members of the Council, the Mayor has agreed that an Extraordinary Meeting of the Council should be held.And, you guessed it, the public and the press may be excluded from the meeting.
The requisition states:
"We hereby call an Emergency Council meeting to discuss the follow Motion:
This Council regrets the incompetence of Councillor Fisher's administration over the failed privatisation of Libraries to John Laing.
It is vital that Croydon Council must be efficient and effective in delivery of front line services.
We agree to match the savings proposed in the John Laing deal by forming a cross party working group to deliver a Co-operative model based on devolved budgets and responsibilities; staff being employed directly through the council; removal of senior management layers; and ending the practice of expensive outsourced contracts for IT and facilities management"
Camera ResolutionTo resolve that, under Section 100A(4) of the Local Government Act, 1972, the press and public be excluded from the meeting for the following item of business on the grounds that it involves the likely disclosure of exempt information falling within those paragraphs indicated in Part 1 of Schedule 12A of the Local Government Act 1972, as amended.Irrespective of this emails are circulating furiously, given the short time frame in order to alert residents to this meeting.
Given that this is a really important issue to residents and that local councillors know this, we are left wondering who no one was alerted to this if notice of this meeting was circulated to all councillors over a week ago? That's what the posting clearly shows. See the issue date at the bottom of the entry, reproduced below.
As a campaign group we would like to know:
Were you alerted to this meeting by any councillor of any party?
We know of only the Upper Norwood Library Campaign being altered by one councillor and in the hope that they would support Labour's plans.
Do you support the co-operative model being put forward by Croydon Labour?
We are yet to hear of any Croydon resident who asked for this or who is in support of this.
And
It is unlikely any resident or campaigner will get to speak but a very obvious question remains. Why are Labour proposing to match savings offered by Laing when GLL's bid was cheaper and provided a better level of service?
Please add your comment to this post.
We'd love to hear what residents really think.
There is no sense to this EGM text at all.
ReplyDelete1) It's nowhere near condemnatory enough about the library policy the Tory Council has followed so far - in so far as it is a policy to support any culture in Croydon beyond Fairfield Halls.
2) Why does it propose a cooperative model out of the blue like this? It may indeed be a possible option, but did no-one in the Labour Party consider consulting with the campaign group and/or leaving open the GLL option.